Penfield Family
|
|
Penfield Family Penfield Genealogy
|
This Web genealogy includes descendants of Samuel Penfield (ca. 1651–1710), who is believed to be the first Penfield born in North America. He was born in Lynn, Massachusetts, and in 1675 married Mary Lewis of Charlestown, Massachusetts (1653–1742, granddaughter of 1631 immigrant Abraham Browne who settled in Watertown, Massachusetts). Their ten children, 5 boys and 5 girls, all grew to maturity. In 1679 they moved to Rehoboth, MA, then to Bristol, RI (then part of the Plymouth Colony), and finally in 1708 to Guilford, CT. Later generations of Penfields have followed suit, moving to all parts of the United States and other countries. The early Penfields must have been a hardy bunch, and married strong people, judging from the size of the families and the success rate of children growing up to have families of their own. There are lots of descendants to list.
Here is the source of most of the information in this Web genealogy:
This 321-page book reports the diligent research of Harold William Penfield (1889–1955) and his wife Florence Bentz Penfield (1895–1980), done over many years and published by her after his death. The book has no publication date, but the most recent entry seems to be 1965. A few Penfields in the 12th generation are listed. In this Web genealogy some recent information is included, and some errors corrected, but no attempt was made to bring this work up to date in a comprehensive way. A reprint of the book can be ordered from Higginson Book Company.
Mary Penfield (generation 2) married Jeremiah Fairbanks. Much of the information about their descendants came from the extensive (over 18,000 entries) Web site Fairbanks and Keester maintained by Jack Keester. The even more extensive genealogy of Marilynn Munoz has many Penfields. The on-line genealogy maintained by the Thomas Minor Society shows many of his descendants who married Penfields. Data for some descendants of Elizabeth Penfield (generation 3) came from Don Parrish’s Web site. Hannah Penfield (generation 2) married John Turner, Jr.; the extensive genealogy Hicks, Essex, & related families by Jack Hicks provided much information about her descendants. Hannah Penfield (generation 3) was the first of many early Penfields to marry Peltons; the Peter Pelton Family Web site maintained by Gary Garbe has many of these descendants. Many Penfields married Beardsleys and there is much information in the Descendants of William Hugh Beardsley maintained by Gail Josef. Use was made of data in the site Descendants Of Northern New York State Pioneer Godfrey Shew maintained by Pete Shew. I want to thank the people who maintain those sites for their hard work and willingness to make their valuable information available to all.
There are many other genealogy Web sites that contain data about various Penfields or Penfield descendants. Some of this data is accurate and some is doubtful. I have used some of it that seemed reliable and proved convenient. In addition, I have incorporated miscellaneous facts found from Google searches; examples include recent obituaries and news stories.
Many family members have told me about recent changes, including births, marriages, and deaths, and also recent scholarship about the early Penfields. Of particular note are Lyman (1927–2004) and Karen (1927–2003) Mower, who wrote a book Ancestry of Annie Frances Penfield (1853–1936) about his grandmother, available from Higginson Book Company. Part of this 720-page book covers Annie’s line of descent from Samuel Penfield through six generations. Mr. Mower has generously supplied an excerpt from his book that covers this line, and allowed it to be mounted on this Web site. You can download it from here as a Microsoft Word document (1.3 MB). The careful research that went into this new book revealed several minor errors in the Florence Bentz Penfield book, and also one apparent case of mistaken identity in the second generation (Sam Jr.’s wife was Hannah Fry, not Hannah Shepard).
Another book that covers one branch of the family is Penfields & Esteps by Gwen (Beran) Bohlen, which she calls “a tale of two colonial families and their part in the settling of the west” written “in memory of four pioneering women of the west,” namely Caroline Chandler (1805–1899), Lydia Jane Hays (1830–1857), Ann Caroline Penfield (1853–1907), and Ann’s mother-in-law Sevilla Smith Estep (1815–1901). This 122-page book was privately printed in 2008.
In addition, I want to thank the following who supplied data which I have used:
There are 2570 Penfields listed in the Florence Bentz Penfield book, along with many other people who either married into the family or are related to those who did. Like most genealogies, this book deals primarily with those who are born with the surname. Descendants of female Penfields are not included, other than by a brief mention, seldom more than one generation deep. This Web genealogy departs from this convention and has as its intended domain Samuel and Mary and all their descendants with their spouses. Needless to say, this expands the genealogy to lots more people, and not many have been included so far. I will add more as time permits.
| Generation | Penfields in book | Penfields in this site | Samuel Penfield and his descendants in this site |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 3 | 16 | 16 | 44 |
| 4 | 60 | 60 | 145 |
| 5 | 135 | 135 | 361 |
| 6 | 342 | 342 | 791 |
| 7 | 539 | 450 | 1224 |
| 8 | 536 | 316 | 1072 |
| 9 | 451 | 191 | 801 |
| 10 | 313 | 147 | 709 |
| 11 | 149 | 95 | 532 |
| 12 | 18 | 30 | 349 |
| 13 | 0 | 10 | 133 |
| 14 | 0 | 1 | 25 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2570 | 1804 | 6197 (9089 including spouses) |
You may find errors here. Don’t be surprised. The Florence Bentz Penfield book has many minor errors (including the spelling of my name). Original sources are often hard to read for various reasons. Record keeping was not always taken as seriously as it is now, and records have not always survived. Some genealogists are more careful than others. The same person’s name might have been spelled differently by different people or at different times.
Please keep in mind that I have not actually done any of the research reported here. All I do is tell you what other people say, although I have tried to do that accurately. I have also corrected some minor errors, in most cases noting conflicting sources. Sometimes I have had to make a judgement about whom to believe, and occasionally I have included multiple interpretations.
If you have information which would help fill out this genealogy, or if you discover an error, please let me know. The advantage of a Web genealogy is that errors can be expunged over time. I am Paul Livingstone Penfield, Jr., in the 10th generation, no. 2174 in the book, and you can send me e-mail at <paul (at) penfield.fm>.
If you don’t find your own branch of the family adequately represented, let me know and I’ll alter the priorities about which entries to add next. You’ll have to tell me all the recent facts to include (full names of all descendants and spouses, including middle names, and birth, marriage, and death dates and, if known, places).
Many Penfields in the ninth and later generations are alive today. To respect their privacy, this genealogy does not list by name any people born after about 1910 without a death date. It calls them “Living male” or “Living female.” (A few living people are listed by name because I do not know their birth dates. Please help by telling me any missing birth dates, and other missing data for that matter.)
Because of this privacy policy you won’t find your own name listed. Everybody wants to see their name in print, I know. But you can do the next best thing by locating your place in the family tree. Look for one of your deceased ancestors, perhaps your grandfather, and then navigate through the pages and you won‘t have any trouble identifying your parents, siblings, aunts and uncles, and cousins even if they are only called “Living male” or “Living female.”
This project turned into one of special interest to me because Samuel Penfield’s wife’s grandfather, Abraham Browne, lived in Watertown, Massachusetts. Today I live in what was at that time part of Watertown. Abraham arrived in 1631, just one year after Watertown was founded, and rapidly became a community leader. He was a land surveyor and served several terms on the elected town board. He laid out roads and divided the land so all citizens could be given farms of equal value. However, it seems some were more equal than others.
In 1638 it was decided that land near my present home be used for new farms for all citizens, and five prominent men, including Abraham Browne, were given this order. When the schedule of lots was presented in 1642, it did not list several of the town leaders, including all who had been ordered to do the surveying. The schedule did mention “farms laid out formerly” and these turned out to be large in area, in nearby land well suited for farming, close to the road. And who do you think got those farms? Henry Bond, in the 1855 definitive history of early Watertown, listed them all (including Abraham Browne), and concluded that “the committee of Oct., 1638, to lay out the farm lands, was composed of persons here named and not contained in the schedule, and, that during three years and a half after their appointment, they seem to have laid out few besides their own farms.” Twenty-five years later historian Samuel Adams Drake wrote that “The allotment committee seem to have provided farms for themselves and a few friends in advance of the general allotment of May, 1642.”
Apparently municipal corruption is not a recent development.